"Your form of customer service is unfortunately rare in today's marketplace, and even rarer online. Your excellent and forward-thinking approach for handling this simple matter of a delay in product from your supplier, make me feel confident that you are fully able to handle any more serious problems that come your way. You have earned a long-term customer"
- Peter, VA
User Ratings & Opinions
26 total ratings
15% rated
23% rated
8% rated
4% rated
50% rated
Own this product?
Add your rating now:
Great Holster
User: John Wicker, Jan 25, 2007
I have tried numerous holsters for my Treo 700. This one holds it tightly with a good latch. The old version had a poor latch that clipped to the lip on the top and never held firmly. My treo fell out numerous times. The belt clip also locks into the various positions well. Good one so far.
Best Holster for 755p yet!!
User: John Machado, Jun 6, 2007
Pros:
Fits and looks good!
Cons:
No protection on the inner part of the belt clip, can mar your belt.
I have read many reviews on this product, but after finding out there was an updated version with a stronger spring, I bought one and I have to say that it is the nicest looking one I have found. The only thing I was disappointed was that the inside of the belt clip does not have a smooth cover and this will mar your belt, assuming you wear a belt.
I definitely would recommend this holster the only reason I did not give it a five star was due to the lack of protection on the inside of the belt clip.
ON a side note, I bought a Cellet holster for my Treo 650, everyone claimed it broke easily and what not, I had mine for a year and it is still in perfect order, and that is after 30 flights across this great country of ours, so becareful when reading posts that say, it broke four days after I got it, if that person is not giving specifics, it could very well be improper handling/use.
Received it on a Wednesday and it broke the following Monday
User: Matt Kerkhoff, Jun 4, 2007
Pros:
Shipping was fast
Cons:
Broke in less than a week
The shipping was very fast. However, it broke today. I think the problem mostly is that the clip is too wide for a standard slacks belt. It seems loose and it wiggles on your belt loop. If you have a wider belt loop, it will work better. I lifted my hands up to grab something and as I swung my hands back, I hit the hoster and the belt loop broke. COME ON. I'VE ONLY WORN IT TWICE. I recommend buying a belt loop clip or a pouch instead.
broke after 2 weeks use
User: Hugh Foy, Jan 24, 2007
Pros:
works well, low profile
Cons:
not durable
I liked the rotating, low profile holster. The design was similar to one I used for my Kyocera for 3 years. Unfortunately, this one broke after less than 3 weeks of use. First the clip mechanism popped out of the back of the holster, then when I tried to pop it back in, the clip broke.
WILL DROP YOUR PHONE
User: User Of Treo, Jan 31, 2007
Pros:
none unique
Cons:
week spring; seat for phone is not deep enough
I know everybody is running to get Treo 750 and then they are running to get a case for it. I am one of those people. Got this case because it looked like the one i used to have for my iPAQ. However, this is NOT a good case. The spring that hold the phone in place is very weak and can be moved by naturally-ocurring circumstances such as your hand, shoulder bag, clothes, etc. I have dropped my phone 3 times already because of that and am totally angry at the manufacturer. Also, the phone is easy to get out of the holster only in horizontal position. When it is vertical the action becomes awkward. I recommend you wait for a better release of a holster and use a leather case or pouch until then. The feeling of dropping that brand-new $650 on concrete and scratching it is not pleasant!!!
TREO and TreoCentral are trademarks or registered trademarks of palm, Inc. in the
United States and other countries; the TreoCentral mark and domain name are used
under license from palm, Inc. The views expressed on this website are solely those
of the proprietor, or contributors to the site, and do not necessarily reflect the
views of palm, Inc.
